I think this is a simpler and quicker approach for adding customizations of a generated NSManagedObject subclass without resorting to use mogenerator.
I’m not sure if there are lots of special cases where mogenerator is better. Mogenerator is basically subclassing the generated NSManagedObject subclass. So, I think we could also do that by subclassing. That’s if we really need a full subclass, not just a category.

Fantastic news today from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). After a lot of hard work and mountains of paperwork, jailbreaking your iPhone is now explicitly a permitted fair use under the DMCA!
…
The EFF also successfully renewed the existing DMCA exception for carrier…
This is what I call fairness.
There are times when we were young, inspired by various information, training, and maybe “indoctrination”. All of these were thrown at us because we were empty-headed.
We did our best (or worst) to promote who we are in the most expressive way. Because that’s how we are trained to get ahead. This is especially true in the world full of social competition and reputation.
As we grow and gather enough experience. We tend to “reduce” what we publish from ourselves. We want to eliminate distractions and focus on what we do best. The bad qualities are minimized and probably hidden, while we keep on focusing on “what good qualities to publish?”
We want to do “hopefully” one thing, and do it good. This is because we had learned from past mistakes, and we just don’t want to get sucked into that hole again.
We want to achieve good quality, but it doesn’t come from complicated things. It comes from a result of abstraction of complexity that appears simple.
Therefore, with this appearance of simplicity, we don’t need to explain how complex it’s (just to create a good impression). Quality should speak for itself.
Well, enough musings. My sleeping cycle is shifted again.
“Exploration of my ancestors, leads nowhere” Einstein told Hans Muehsam late in life (Mar. 4, 1953).
“I think we can dispense with this question of heritage”, quoted by Carl Seelig (his biographer).
Don’t you love it if some well-known public figure who had contributed something to humanity, agreed with your point of view?
There’s a difference between reading the thoughts of people who are delivering a dogmatic message, compared to those who open up your mind to something that you didn’t realize before, but you already understand it deep inside your head.
This is what I enjoy from reading the thoughts of people similar to him.
fuckyeahcomputerscience:
thedailyfallout:
An argument that the days in which computer science majors from non-elite universities had great job prospects is ending, due to worker training programs and the unconcern of most employers with academic credentials.
Stereotyping again, aren’t we?
Some people are looking into Skype integration for Adium. The current solution with a Skype plugin is not satisfactory — running a Skype client — due to the decentralized nature of Skype.
Another thing to be considered is SkypeKit in Pidgin. Even in this case, it’s still not an ideal solution. I still prefer not to maintain an account just for Skype (because everyone is using it), and another for XMPP and Gmail, or SIP.
So my ideal suggestion is Adium as a popular and user-friendly app for these internet standards: XMPP and SIP. Skype should just be a secondary priority.
Twitter client? The preferable Twitter use case for Adium is for DM, conversation, or maybe “breaking news”, if that’s possible via Twitter system. This is where superfeedr could play a part.
The whole timeline updates, and various things that we use on Twitter are better to be done on Twitter clients. This is because Twitter clients are not designed as an app running in the background, notifying us of important messages, or for real-time conversation.
Have you been looking for a chat client that can work on all of your various chat services, all at once? Look no further. Adium is what you should be using. It’s easily the best chat client on OS X.
Adium has been around since the very first version of OS X and has only gotten better with…
These findings are counterintuitive. Think about it. Why would asserting one’s intentions undermine rather than advance a stated goal? Perhaps, Senay hypothesized, it is because questions by their nature speak to possibility and freedom of choice. Meditating on them might enhance feelings of autonomy and intrinsic motivation, creating a mind-set that promotes success.
It reminds of how most schools give up by offering an absolute answer to everything. This is done to attain a school reputation or goal, instead of fostering the growth of questioning everything — which is the essence of learning and discovery.
But, this experiment may not be entirely true. Determination may come without the process of “Would I do this?”. Soldiers or mercenaries are the examples for this. Although it will be true in the case of “being a hero”.
alexislloyd:
Compelling article from Scientific American arguing that willpower doesn’t work as well as we collectively seem to think it does.
[One group] was basically putting their minds into wondering mode, while the [second group] was asserting themselves and their will. It is the difference between “Will I do this?” and “I will do this.”
The results were provocative. People with wondering minds completed significantly more anagrams than did those with willful minds. In other words, the people who kept their minds open were more goal-directed and more motivated than those who declared their objective to themselves.
“Our sole responsibility is to produce something smarter than we are; any problems beyond that are not ours to solve… [T]here are no hard problems, only problems that are hard to certain level of intelligence. Move the smallest bit upwards [in level of intelligence], and some problems will suddenly move from “impossible” to “obvious.” Move a substantial degree upwards, and all of them will become obvious.”
—
Elizer S. Yudkowsky,
Staring Into The Singularity, 1996, cited in
Ray Kurzweil,
The Singularity Is Near, Penguin Books Ltd, London, England, 2005, p. 35 (via
amiquote) (via
wildcat2030)